Because 200x200 avatars almost always end up being 80-90kb.
Printable View
Because 200x200 avatars almost always end up being 80-90kb.
and because I don' want to have to keep removing key frames/color quality from my animated avis
Seriously a massive peeve of mine whenever I don a new avatar.
If you make a standard 200x200 .png they will always come out in the 80-95 kb field.
So then you have to compress it/change its resolution in order for it to not lose its transparency to the vBulletin compression system.
This simple change would fix that.
Now, let's watch Neir defend his "No" vote!
Because fuck everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
My avatar is going to do what she does to asses to your ass
dry
Only if animated avatars are simultaneously banned.
Noh
Poll's creator didn't think of that option, apparently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seika
Blackfield voted yes, so clearly the correct answer is no.
^^ Hence no vote. :p
How about no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seika
That's completely orthogonal. If you want anigif avatars to get banned, make a separate poll.
Why would we want this again?
And you have a fucktarded signature that's as annoying as Christemo's but I don't go on about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neir
No.
Remove all avatars, signatures, genders, titles, postcounts, join dates, usernames- they are all extraneous. Return BL to the chaos. It will be better that way.
This pleases me.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackField
As long as the change doesn't end up breaking some critical and important part of the site I'm all for it.
just like my /fate/Quote:
Originally Posted by Satehi
I like Neir's sig, so BlackField, eat a bowl of dicks.Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackField
Put that in your sig and smoke it.
Haha, people actually go on that board still?Quote:
Originally Posted by Spinach