Originally Posted by
Apple
@Nununu:
Yes, but it still does not make them his if he was merely the collector. There had to be something along the lines of a previous owner (who could possibly have wielded the thing) >> Gil >> dude who stuck it in a tree/etc.
But again, if we accept that the ancient Babylonians owned the blueprints of multiple asian weapons, western broadswords and a grinder of sorts that was used to signify divinity in ancient India, then the argument does not mean anything, since it only illustrates possibilities. Which is precisely why I said that it does not cover all bases.