Enkidu may be a weapon but since they have a personality, I refer to them as they.
Unless Nasu tells us that Enkidu prefers to be referred to as a thing instead of a person, that is. I doubt we'd ever be told what pronouns Enkidu actually prefers.
FGO Supports (Last Update: 2019-08 Anniversary)
Quotes
Some would argue that Japanese doesn't have pronouns at all.
Japan even has gender-specific first person pronouns, right?
- - - Updated - - -
Though, from my extremely limited knowledge of Japanese, pronouns might be a bit looser then English in some senses. For instance, "Boku" is a typically male first-person pronoun, but a girl (I think?) could still use it and it would just mean she was extremely tomboyish/impolite rather then outright transgender or anything.
So, there may not be "straight" male/female pronouns but there's definitely ones inordinately tied with one gender or another.
僕っ娘 and 俺女 exist, everyone uses 私 for formal conversation, and this all gets even more wild when you consider dialects.
FGO Supports (Last Update: 2019-08 Anniversary)
Quotes
Not that strange when you consider that, while he can create swords with UBW, he doesn't have any unique sword associated with him in particular like Excalibur or Balmung. Whereas Gilgamesh on the other hand, probably could qualify as a Saber since he does have an original sword (Ea).
Really, his most suitable class should be Caster since he's a mage before he is a swordsman/bowman.
The excuse for why he can't be a Saber is stats, though considering sabers like Okita exist that could be easily retconed.
There's a post by You about merits of being a swordsman or something being the qualifier
whatever that means
So what ur saying is that u got an equivalent of more than A in linguistic right
I haz a patreon please support onegai:
clickable fancy banner link
Currently (like, actually) finishing Apocrypha 3