Can't they just build it per annum. Also, whatever happened to the You-smack-a (mole)/"You, Simca" deal that was the thing that would funnel the money to fund it?
I am not defending Vic. You must be confusing me with the other guy who actually was.
What I am talking about is essentially if a company can remove a person on their own volition without the state saying "hold on". Apparently,
this is the case in Texas and I've acknowledged it as such (no clue because I didn't bother reading into your post, I just took it at face value and assumed your argument was truthful). THIS is what worries me because it means
the law cannot protect people from extortion. I am not saying
this case is so, but I would be worried if there wasn't at least some laws that forced the company to compensate you for removing you if an investigation says you've been removed unlawfully. I am not saying he should be allowed to continue, but in those scenarios,
you furlough them. They stay home without pay until the investigation is done. If you're guilty, the furlough turns into a sacking. If not, you get compensation for all the time you weren't paid, just like US Govt workers during shutdown.
Essentially, plenty of people having a legitimate complaint (or hell, one person with a legitimate and verifiable complaint) is a fair reason to get sacked if confirmed. Having a mob of people who hate you and can badmouth you off a company is hell for worker's rights. You have no clue how often I ended up working with people who wanted me off my workplace (apparently, showing favoritism to the best worker under you is a bad thing) and how they knew they had no recourse because making something up or saying X, Y and Z would've launched an investigation into the issue and if I was cleared, the company would have to compensate me for the time I would be laid off, not lay me off until the Tribunal sent their ruling and even take fire those who were guilty of conspiring against me.
If you can point me to a similar set of protections existing in Texas, I'll shut up and say this can't happen. Hell, I wasn't even into the Vic issue when I learned about it. I simply felt the ability to fire someone on request with no actual court verdict (thus, "people's justice" or what I'd call "mob rule" is the one who judges people) is something I would be wary off and that I hope it's not as simply as telling someone to pack up their stuff without a professional's input.
Take it from someone who's been in that actual position (thus it's personal) where, had I been in Texas, I would've lost that job. People's words are
NOT reliable unless they can be corroborated by professionals or authorities.
I think I'm gonna be sick. No wonder you guys consider a
centrist European a communist!
Originally Posted by AsGryffynn
Reply With Quote
