If Trump is gone before 2020 it'll be because his heart is finally crushed by his fat or because he gets fed up and resigns
If Trump is gone before 2020 it'll be because his heart is finally crushed by his fat or because he gets fed up and resigns
That's actually kind of the point. Trump won their primary, but to a lot of the politicians representing the GOP he is not on their side, and visibly does not give a shit about them or what they want. You have to remember that removing him doesn't mean a Democrat gets in to replace him, but that Pence replaces him. Impeaching Trump doesn't contradict your characterization at all.Originally Posted by Mcjon01
ASTOLFO. IS. BEST. GIRL.
Jeanne is... also best girl and Jeanne Alter is EVEN MORE also best girl.
The Republican Party operates under Democratic Centralism, wherein the leader of the party selected by their democratic internal process is absolute and their decisions are binding on all members. Some Republicans, like Coward McCain, make a lot of noise about how he's a RINO but have still backed him every single time when it came down to it (in McCain's particular case because Mitch keeps his testicles on the mantlepiece in McConnell Manor). They will never turn on him, and those that do would simply be replaced by the rabid base which supports Trump based on his opposition to democrats and brown people.
eric and donald jr
[18:00] Spinach: Because I don't like Saber's personality but boy oh boy does she make my dick turn to diamonds when I see her getting tentacled.
[18:01] Leo: feeling superior to EU makes me hard
[16:16] <Bloble> Drakengard? Is that a rhythm game?
i hear they don't like being called white supremacists either but trump definitely qualifies for the more modern academic usage of white supremacist that has more or less overridden the older classic definition
Have any mainstream academics actually vouched on the issue yet? I'd be interested to hear, since most scholars (at least when last I read) don't agree that he's a fascist.
http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/...66S48.facebook
Republicans: Totally not cartoon supervillains, really
http://www.weaverhouse40.com/Respons..._of_HB1406.pdf
A couple of months ago, the state's Attorney General filed a brief in a lawsuit related to this statute in which he said that the law, as written and enacted, was unconstitutional. It is not unusual for the legislature to repeal a law that is unconstitutional.
Thankfully, there is another statute still on the books that makes it clear that when a child is born to a married woman, the child is presumed to be that of her husband. So, the repeal of the law does not de-legitimize a child conceived by insemination and, to be honest, the law that will remain on the books is less intrusive into the relationship of a husband and wife than the statute being repealed. Unlike the law being repealed, the remaining law that will now govern the situation does not have the government inquiring into the means by which the couple's child came into existence or whose sperm, the husband's or a donor's, was used.
I hope that helps explain the overall situation.
Thanks,
Terri Lynn Weaver
???
white supremacist =/= fascist ????
or are moving onto whether we should call trump a fascist or not
They're different things of course.
I was just pointing out that there seems to be a tendency for the people who actually study these sorts of issues to be more hesitant in applying the more extreme labels then laymen...
Ohhh, yeah, I think I misread your earlier post. They don't need to come out and say anything since the definition I'm talking about has been around for awhile, there's even a nifty section on wikipedia about it on the white supremacy page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_...se_of_the_term
Playing to play is fine
Arguing = playing
But arguing (playing) to argue (play) is wrong
Hmmm.
Anyway this entire awful thread lives and breathes needless pedantry so if you want me to tell Bloble to not be pedantic maybe you're better off petitioning for a thread lock.
- - - Updated - - -
Anyway don't flame and as dads Tobias and Mac have said, don't get personal.
Also don't spam reports. We get the idea with the first one. Reporting someone like 18 times in a row isn't going to make them get punished faster, it's just going to make you look frivolous.
Especially if it's over opinions.
He never sleeps. He never dies.
Battle doesn't need a purpose; the battle is its own purpose. You don't ask why a plague spreads or a field burns. Don't ask why I fight.
mac plz stay out of other peoples accounts
Hm
Hm
Last edited by 2Bad; February 12th, 2017 at 11:45 AM.
There's only one unironic racist on this thread tbh.
Oh do tell.
You're acquainted.
What race do they target? I'd be fascinated to know.
Posting Permissions
