I read a study about the density of information in spoken language that indicated that while there was some variation for complex concepts in some languages that most languages took approximately the same amount of time to express similar concepts, regardless of whether their words were long or short. I guess the idea is that if you have longer words for some concepts, it will require fewer of them to say the same thing. I'm not sure how universal this is, and I've heard that some languages use loan words from others because forming technical jargon in their own languages, while possible, isn't as practical as just using someone else's building blocks for it. I'm speaking in large generalizations because I find it interesting but don't want to do a lot of research at the moment.
But I guess getting back to the subject of handwriting, I wonder about the way character-based scripts look because I can imagine that it's a much steeper learning curve to learn how to do it in the first place. But then, maybe it just has to do with context and exposure in the first place.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh no.
Also, part of me still refuses to believe that cuneiform says anything.