No following TM humor she is Akiha +
No following TM humor she is Akiha +
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
everyone is a loli if you try hard enough to seem like the only normal person on an anime forum
why you would consider that a worthy pursuit in the first place is a question better asked in a non judging self introspection session
[04:55] Lianru: i3uster is actuallly quite cute
I mean her and saber have the exact same bodytype. Taiga too.
Lolis errrywhere man
saber is canonically prepubescent as seen through lion king
if you use the GO CE as grown up rin design that girl has no future in this department thus its totally fine
really if you wanna be on the safe side just overstate your love for characters that are clearly middle aged, its the only way to dodge
[04:55] Lianru: i3uster is actuallly quite cute
lion king's actually rhon's influence for probably the most part
just putting that out there
Oh but I like Illya and Rhyme. I like pokemon too. Cute things are cute.
Yeah but Morgan.Originally Posted by Zurvan
The genes are in there
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
Sure, but then the loli designs are either incidental or actually detrimental.
Illya's Loli design was never unintentional
especially since it was likely she was gonna get her own route in the original eroge
Last edited by Iceblade44; October 15th, 2018 at 01:49 PM.
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
The way she sat on Shirou's leg in the Fate route makes it look like she wouldn't have cared if she got a route or not because she was going to make her own bad ending/route from there.
Is it worth pointing out that the girl Humbert Humbert was enamoured with was a precocious teen who ended up propositioning him, or should I just chalk it up to the death of classic literature and move on
Last edited by Deathhappens; October 15th, 2018 at 02:10 PM.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
she had an old soul officer
I'm sure people mentioning Lolita the book do it only accidentally and have no idea what it's about, thank you for the education.
True, but he's also the first person narrator, so it's ambiguous how much of it is 'No I swear officer she came onto me first!'
Also Dolores isn't the only girl he's into. If you'd read the book you'd know that. Nymphets and whatnot.
Literally the first paragraphs of the prologue, my dude
Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.
She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita.
Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, a certain initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style.
And I guess I'll just repeat myself again to forestall your inevitable response
Last edited by Deathhappens; October 15th, 2018 at 02:13 PM.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
What are you even talking about? You sound like you're disagreeing with Asterism but the part you quoted actually confirms what he said (that Humbert was obsessed with little girls before Dolores).
INcidental, not ACcidental.
He literally moves to Dolores's hometown because his hosts have a 12 year old daughter (not her) that he can perv on.
- - - Updated - - -
That his target in this instance actually made the first move doesn't change the fact that he's a paedophile voyeur.
(also he masturbates about Dolores even before he finds out she's interested in him)
Just to be clear, I agree with you here.
Doesn't he also abuse Lolita as well?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
