Consider the meaning of "hegemonic". The answer should be fairly obvious.
Consider the meaning of "hegemonic". The answer should be fairly obvious.
So the hegemonic ones are the ones who want players to have less choices of games that they can play on consoles and even fewer content on those games. Got it.Originally Posted by SpoonyViking
So, if people want to spot differences they're forced to play JP... welp.It's been going around on reddit that they censored the dialogue in David, Asterios and Astolfo's scenes and bond lines. I can't say if the fan translations are more accurate, but I can say that it's always felt weird that David blushes in that one voice line where, according to the official TL, he's saying something completely innocuous.
At any rate, I bought a $40 pack like I said I would a few days ago.
Spoiler:
"Less choice" and "content". Sure, whatever you need to tell yourself.
I don't know what you boys are talking about, but "hegemonic" doesn't mean "domineering but in the bad sense".
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
Seriously, you two? I'm not even pulling a Dullahan and just quoting Fairclough, Foucault or Gramsci, it's right there in the dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hegemony. Check for the second meaning: "the social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group".
Ended up taken 54 turns to finish the challenge quest, made too many mistakes.
Vlad and waver died to Medb, and after 30 turns stalling with Hans, Mash and Tama, i remember i had Gil in the bench, so i let Hans die and steamrolled the rest. no CS used
The hell?
No way for me to complete the CQ without Merlin, still too weak I guess.
I feel defeated.
Ok, let me summarise: if a game really undergoes censorship of any kind (a term which I'm loath to use in cases other than actual governmental intervention), it's purely because of commercial reasons, not because of any supposed "SJW conspiracy". See any game with nudity sold on Steam, like HuniePop or that one with the cat girls.
- - - Updated - - -
Second summary: when it comes to demographics to which works of art or entertainment traditionally cater, liberals, feminists and related groups aren't at the top of the chain, and in fact said groups tend to act in a much less concerted manner, unlike conservatives, men's rights activists and related groups.
I haven’t seen any such outcry like that here yet though.
BL Character Defining Lines
And I'm pulling the "my language" card to say "hegemon" means "leader" and hegemonic" deriving from that means "one who is like or possess qualities of a leader".
Labeling a community of people that is plain wrong. Even using the definition from the dictionary you brought up.
Last edited by Deathhappens; February 17th, 2019 at 05:46 AM.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
BL Character Defining Lines
”Fine. I’ll do it myself.”
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
And considering we're not communicating either in Ancient Greek (which isn't your language) or modern one, and that regardless of its roots language evolves, I'm going to ignore that as the moronic argument it is.
- - - Updated - - -
Really? I'm surprised. That's basically LVL's argument, among a few others here.
... even talking about it is an outcry?
BEHOLD! THE SIG OF GOLDEN TRUTH! Pillaged from McJon, Tsukikan et al.
Harping on it, yes.
Plus, reminder the supposed situation is basically a bogeyman.
The discussion is whether or not it is a "bogeyman". You say that people should stop "harping on it" because it is a bogeyman. That's quite some round logic. That's like President Eden in Fallout 3 saying that he is perfect because he is programmed to be.
It's almost as if he wants to silence the truth.
Censorship by private organizations is still censorship, such as forced by Sony: https://gematsu.com/2019/02/senran-k...nt-regulations
Whether or not you want to paint it as being the work of "le ebil SJWs" or you wanna say that it's done in the name of marketability or """""decency""""", it's still a thing that Sony is doing and it sucks for the target demographic. It's completely fair for them to voice their displeasure and desire that this not be the case moving forward. You can disagree with the people presenting an argument or the way they present it but still empathize with where they come from.
Sure, complain away, what do I care? But complain to the company. When he's putting blame at the feet of "le ebil SJWs", well, that's either intellectual dishonesty or MRA-level of delusion.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
