What exactly do you think needs to be changed to "accommodate" a yuri pairing?Originally Posted by Deathhappens
Are you saying that a lesbian can't love another girl in the same way a man could? (Emotionally I mean, obviously the physical side of love is another matter entirely)
Last edited by RoydGolden; May 24th, 2018 at 01:09 PM.
sniff but is it not the assimilation of all relationships, however superficially different, under the singular Master-narrative of a bourgeois heterosexual romance that is precisely the characteristic gesture of liberal ideology? I am willing to accept the Other in her difference only to the extent that such difference is safely circumscribed within the same.
かん汗ぎゅう牛じゅう充とう棟
Expresses the exceeding size of one's library.
Books are extremely many, loaded on an oxcart the ox will sweat.
At home piled to the ridgepole of the house, from this meaning.
Read out as 「Ushi ni ase shi, munagi ni mitsu.」
Source: 柳宗元「其為書，處則充棟宇，出則汗牛馬。」— Tang Dynasty
Is it not? Does it not?
What specific changes there should or could be are not my place to tell, but unless we're willing to accept that Hakuno and Hakunon are the exact same person plus or minus some fiddly bits, it stands to reason their plotlines should have had at least a cosmetic difference here and there.
They are the same person though, just with genders swapped. That's literally the entire point.
Dullahan, I generally agree with what you have to say about 50% of the time, but I completely fail to understand what you're talking about the other 50%. How does liberal ideology even enter the discussion here?
- - - Updated - - -
And therein lies the rub. If you met yourself from another timeline where you were a girl, would you be the exact same person with different bits? Think on this one for a bit.
Last edited by Deathhappens; May 24th, 2018 at 01:25 PM.
I mean, bringing in random political/philosophical references even when it's completely inappropriate is basically Dullahan's shtick (that and raging against GO). Might as well complain about Nero saying "umu".
- - - Updated - - -
I'm not exactly one to complain either. But at least I try to take myself a little less seriously...
He's basically criticising the view that writing female-female relationships exactly as if they were male-female relationships is more enlightened (enlightenment understood here as an awareness of the existence of gender roles in society and how harmful they can be).
I dislike the "hurr we need more X type of characters in media because diversity" agenda certain parties are pushing, but there is a point to be made there. Simply put, one's gender signifies and affects way more than just some fiddly bits down there, and that's before going into interpersonal relationships between genders. Think of your best friend, for example- would your relationship have developed the same if either you or them were a different gender? Gender equality does not, and should not, equate homogenisation.
(An argument which, incidentally, could be applied to a lot of similar debates, but that's beyond the scope of the current discussion).
Last edited by Deathhappens; May 25th, 2018 at 05:34 AM.
So Olga Marie has returned. I guess her loli appearance in the Back Alley Alliance Nightmare manga was a dead giveaway. But what will she be doing now, I have yet to catch up to the FGO lore. And I plan on watching the Babylonia anime with the Camelot movie. So my question is this, what's her role now so far?
be dead so far
unless you want to go in into speculation, but thats something we'll see happen when it does
She’s still dead in Fgo. We have some theories on whether she is serving as a priestess for an extra-dimensional god but so far she’s still dead in the official books. Everything else is speculation.
sniped by Zurvan
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
Ok, because there was a clip of her in battle in the Cosmos Prologue OVA. That's why I'm asking.
That whole thing was a dream sequence, everythi g we saw there was a memory, delusion, or dream and wasn't real im the conventional sense. Olga herself realizes that in the video. Now the Ova does bring up a lot of uncertain bits(like Olga getting probed by many hands) and is where all the speculation comes from.
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
this is why people should just actually settle into the whole story rather than looking at random out of context stuff
because out of context none of that sequence makes any sense
Localizationing stuff
I seem to think she will be related to the final boss of the lost belts. I doubt they will release 4 lost belts this year. So I'm thinking that they release 4, 5, and 6 this year. And next year they release lost belt 7. Then they reveal a secret 8th lost at Area 51 with Ogla and her servant, Solomen as the lost belt king.
Spellcheck is your friend.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
bring her back because okay design
[18:00] Spinach: Because I don't like Saber's personality but boy oh boy does she make my dick turn to diamonds when I see her getting tentacled.
[18:01] Leo: feeling superior to EU makes me hard
[16:16] <Bloble> Drakengard? Is that a rhythm game?
LB4 in March
LB5 in June
LB6 in September
LB7 in December
This way it ends at the end of the year again, and there's time between early and late dec to add an epilogue or whatever. Going an entire year releasing 3 chapters only (again) would be stupid.
Is Olga back yet
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
I'm impressed it took 9 pages for someone to guess she'd be the final boss.
Reply With Quote
