Badass Versus Thread

[castor212]

And I was NOT saying that he specifically call JUST those 2. What part of the word "ONLY" did you not understand?

oh I understand. But each time I said I understand and specifying that I wasnt nitpicking your argument, just the way you describe it, which is ambiguous, you keep on and on and on and on and on and on and on acting like you didnt heard me saying "HEY MAN IM NOT COUNTERARGUING YOU, IM JUST SAYING THIS IS HOW IT WENT"

Then why did you even brought me in it and be like "im nitpicking your examples here bro u might be misleading ppl with these!"?

Then you think it wrong.
At my first post, I said im just nitpicking how the scene went.
At my first reply I literally said Im not nitpicking your argument (or the example therein) just your scene description.
Thats it. Only after you reply to me I explained that it might be misleading.
Not sure how you even think Im bringing you in. at the beginning. Sounds overdefensive.

Dude, just reread how many times I said I was giving EXAMPLES and you STILL act like I did not say it. Literally my FIRST reply to you. Like, cmon man.

Bro, reread how many times I said I hear loud and clear that you are giving an example
and how many times that I said Im nitpicking just the scene description, not the example itself, and you still act like I attack your example. Literally my first reply to you. Give me a break, pal.

im not nitpicking your argument, im nitpicking how you describe the scene

im not trying to argue you, just describing how the scene went

i never called you wrong, just saying that your description is ambiguous

i nitpick the scene description, not the example

[Iceblade44]

Toby

Puns are deadly

[Lily Emilio]

oh I understand. But each time I said I understand and specifying that I wasnt nitpicking your argument, just the way you describe it, which is ambiguous

And there is nothing wrong with the way I describe it or it is ambiguous because it served the purpose of being an example for "bunrei being used to refer to god servants", like I kept telling you. But no, to you there is something wrong that you must nitpick which I completely disagree.

At my first post I literally said Im not nitpicking your argument (or the example therein) just the scene description.

Which is nonsense because I was not even describing the scene, it's you who got that impression then you went on to nitpick something that does not exist in my reply.

reread how many times I said im not nitpicking your example, just the scene description, and you still act like I attack your example. Literally my first reply to you. Give me a break, bro.

Dude, your first one literally take my example as if I am describing the scene, which is false. By doing so you are attacking my examples, which in turn give the exact impression that you are dictating me. I will give you a break if you stop saying needless things. You knew how I roll. If I make a mistake in my statement I WILL admit and correct it, because I know first hand how things can be misleading.

[castor212]

i completely response to your "THIS IS AN EXAMPLE" with my "I know, im referring to how the scene is described, not the example"
not sure how you think i act like i didnt.

- - - Updated - - -

And there is nothing wrong with the way I describe it or it is ambiguous because it served the purpose of being an example for "bunrei being used to refer to god servants", like I kept telling you.

ANd I never touch your argument of "bunrei being used to refer to god servants"
simply how it can sound like a describing of an event
like I kept telling you.

Which is nonsense because I was not even describing the scene, it's you who got that impression then you went on to nitpick something that does not exist in my reply.

Which I already said not a reply to your example, just saying how it went
you know how it is in a thread. a word from a japanese speaker can suddenly came up in a wiki
I took what you said as a point of reference, but in no way am i making it an attack to your argument or example

Dude, your first one literally take my example as if I am describing the scene, which is false. By doing so you are attacking my examples, which in turn give the exact impression that you are dictating me.

then you got the wrong impression. Even after multiple posts of clarification beyond my first reply, not sure how you even think that

I will give you a break if you stop saying needless things. You knew how I roll. If I make a mistake in my statement I WILL admit and correct it, because I know first hand how things can be misleading.

The only reason im still saying these things is to reply to you, who doesnt seem to get that Im not attacking you, merely "this is how it went to be exact, just saying"
as long as you reply to me while still saying as if you dont get me and accuse me of attacking you, i wont stop replying back.

[Lily Emilio]

Again, if you just want to show the full scene, then you should've just posted the entire thing you've translated earlier with a line like "here's the full scene, I found it" and then be done with it. You did not have to tie me into it, you did not have to "nitpick" nonexistent things in my reply. In short, you did not have to say anything about me. Just say it as a normal comment. But you felt the need to "nitpick" me and this is where we are.

[castor212]

I feel the need to say "nitpick" because your sentence act as a point of reference, and no more than that. I said it as "nitpick" to emphasize that "THIS IS NOT A POST OF COUNTER ARGUMENT, REPEAT, THIS IS NOT A POST OF COUNTER ARGUMENT, THIS IS JUST A POST OF SAYING THAT ONE SMALL DETAIL THAT DOES NOT AFFECT THE ARGUMENT IN ANY WAY"
yet you went overdefensive about it and felt like im attacking you, and when I try to explain "no man, thats not what i meant" you keep on replying defensively as if im still attacking you, even though im trying to explain it civilly.

Again, you couldve just said "its an example" once, and after I said "I know, im not referring to it as an example tho, just scene description" take it as I understood what you meant and leave it at that, but you have to keep on replying defensively.

now here we are.

[GundamFSN]

Beast Lair shitposting Battle Royale
Who shall stand? Who shall fall?
You can use

Anti-Heroes

banned users

and

Divine Spirits

mods

too if you want.

The user who holds the crown position in post total obviously.

Which is...

[castor212]

The user who holds the crown position in post total obviously.

Which is...

McJon

[GundamFSN]

Accurate (no offense).

[Lily Emilio]

I feel the need to say "nitpick" because your sentence act as a point of reference, and no more than that. yet you went overdefensive about it and felt like im attacking you, and when I try to explain "no man, thats not what i meant" you keep on replying defensively as if im still attacking you, even though im trying to explain it civilly.

Again, you couldve just said "its an example" once, and after I said "I know, im not referring to it as an example tho, just scene description" take it as I understood what you meant and leave it at that, but you have to keep on replying defensively.

now here we are.

Again, had you not started it with your "nitpicking" of something nonexistent, it would not escalate. You are the source of this. So as long as you keep escalating this, it will keep going. You want me to stop then stop saying needless things, simple as that. I did not even go defensive, I was telling you that you were saying needless things and tie me into that for no purpose.

[Zurvan]

Castor be the better man

I believe in you

[castor212]

Again, had you not started it with your "nitpicking" of something nonexistent, it would not escalate. You are the source of this. So as long as you keep escalating this, it will keep going. You want me to stop then stop saying needless things, simple as that. I did not even go defensive, I was telling you that you were saying needless things and tie me into that for no purpose.

Again, had you leave it the moment I said "that is not the case", it would not escalate. I may be the source, but youre the fuel that starts escalate it.
All those caps lock and tone felt really defensive, I would know because it sounds how I would sound when I go needlessly defensive. Which I try really hard not to do everytime I argue with you and try to keep it chill. Which you really made it hard with how you seem to not response to my explanation that "thats not what I meant, dude."
Like I said above, I will keep on replying as long as you speak to me as if Im the only problem here and you are not a part of it. So long as you keep up blaming everything on me and does not recognize that you play a part on it, it will keep on going.

- - - Updated - - -

Castor be the better man

I believe in you

Misplaced, your belief is.

[Lily Emilio]

Again, had you leave it the moment I said "that is not the case", it would not escalate. I may be the source, but youre the fuel that starts escalate it.

No. I already made my point clear that I didn't like how you dragged me in and nitpick something I DID NOT do. You otoh still try to justify what you did as fine and dandy, that you were right in "nitpicking" my nonexistence "description of the scene".

All those caps lock and tone felt really defensive, I would know because it sounds how I would sound when I go needlessly defensive. Which I try really hard not to do everytime I argue with you and try to keep it chill.

You do realize that I only use caps to emphasize certain words right? Did I type a full sentence in caps like you sometimes do?

Like I said above, I will keep on replying as long as you speak to me as if Im the only problem here and you are not a part of it.

I am not part of the problem. The problem is you dragging me into your "clarification of the scene" in the form of "nitpicking my description of the scene" - something I never did, it's your misinterpretation of what I said that caused your actions. Even now you still didn't realize what you did there was what annoyed me. All I need from you is that you accept that you should've just post that translation instead of the needless "nitpicking you bro" (or should I say "educating the guy that he should not mislead ppl", that's the impression I got btw). Just say ok I wont' do that shit next time and we're done.

[Deathhappens]

Misplaced, your belief is.

I'm sure I can keep coming up with silly matchups, carry on.

How about

Takamachi Nanoha (StrikerS, no limiter) vs Tachibana Hibiki (AXZ, no friendship powerups but with Ignite Module) in a battle of B E F R I E N D I N G ?

[castor212]

No. I already made my point clear that I didn't like how you dragged me in and nitpick something I DID NOT do.

Yes, and yet you incessantly kept on replying even after my replies of "I get it, im speaking of different things here" as if you dont register my replies

You otoh still try to justify what you did as fine and dandy, that you were right in "nitpicking" my nonexistence "description of the scene".

Im not justifiying what I did, what I did is simply explaining what I did as something unrelated to you. I never meant to rope you in in an argument, you're the only one who felt like that and replied defensively. THe word nitpick is meant to say I "nitpick the scene description", not "counter arguing your replies."

You do realize that I only use caps to emphasize certain words right? Did I type a full sentence in caps like you sometimes do?

Exactly, I too, caps lock certain words to emphasize it instead of just bold or italicizing it when i go needlessly defensive.

I am not part of the problem. The problem is you dragging me into your "clarification of the scene" in the form of "nitpicking my description of the scene" - something I never did, it's your misinterpretation of what I said that caused your actions. Even now you still didn't realize what you did there was what annoyed me. All I need from you is that you accept that you should've just post that translation instead of the needless "nitpicking you bro" (or should I say "educating the guy that he should not mislead ppl", that's the impression I got btw)

Yes you are. Youre the one who got the wrong the impression that I am "dragging you here" when I am not, and youre the one who escalate the whole thing with your replies. It is your misinterpretation that escalates the whole thing, not mine. Even now you still dont realize that, which also annoys me. All I need from you is that you admit that you keep on ignoring the fact that while I do get the wrong impression, I have already realized that and try to explain to you thats not how it is, and that your misinterpretation after I explained the fact is the one that escalates the whole deal.

I never meant to "educating the guy that he should not mislead ppl", I meant to "this is how the scene went, just saying". Which i already said again and again above.

My misinterpretation makes you feel like I rope you in in an argument? Well your misinterpretation makes me feel like youre being defensive, and the fact that you keep on replying as if you dont listen to my explanation escalates the whole deal.

[Lily Emilio]

Yes, and yet you incessantly kept on replying even after my replies of "I get it, im speaking of different things here" as if you dont register my replies

Im not justifiying what I did, what I did is simply explaining what I did as something unrelated to you. I never meant to rope you in in an argument, you're the only one who felt like that and replied defensively. THe word nitpick is meant to say I "nitpick the scene description", not "counter arguing your replies."

Exactly, I too, caps lock certain words to emphasize it instead of just bold or italicizing it when i go needlessly defensive.

Yes you are. Youre the one who got the wrong the impression that I am "dragging you here" when I am not, and youre the one who escalate the whole thing with your replies. It is your misinterpretation that escalates the whole thing, not mine. Even now you still dont realize that, which also annoys me. All I need from you is that you admit that you keep on ignoring the fact that while I do get the wrong impression, I have already realized that and try to explain to you thats not how it is, and that your misinterpretation after I explained the fact is the one that escalates the whole deal.

I never meant to "educating the guy that he should not mislead ppl", I meant to "this is how the scene went, just saying". Which i already said again and again above.

My misinterpretation makes you feel like I rope you in in an argument? Well your misinterpretation makes me feel like youre being defensive, and the fact that you keep on replying as if you dont listen to my explanation escalates the whole deal.

When I'm actually defensive, I use ALOT of swear words, not just words like "shit". Ask Altaris he knew how vulgar I can be on skype when I'm mad about something. You've never seen me when I'm actually defensive or being super annoyed of something. The moment you mentioned me in your reply, you dragged me it bro, it's obvious, it doesn't matter if you intentionally or unintentionally did that, the fact that you mentioned me means you involved me with your comment.

I already got that you were talking about the description of the scene and not my examples like 2 pages ago. But you still did not get that I want you to understand what you should've done in the first place, aka post the translations and do nothing else that involve me, so that next time we won't have this same conversation. That is why I keep replying, until you get that.

[castor212]

When I'm actually defensive, I use ALOT of swear words, not just words like "shit". Ask Altaris he knew how vulgar I can be on skype when I'm mad about something. You've never seen me when I'm actually defensive or being super annoyed of something.

I guess my defensive mode has less defensive thresold than yours then.

The moment you mentioned me in your reply, you dragged me it bro, it's obvious, it doesn't matter if you intentionally or unintentionally did that, the fact that you mentioned me means you involved me with your comment.

And the moment that you kept on replying back even if I already explained that was not my intention, you play a part at escalating the whole deal. Doesnt matter if Im the starter, pal, youre the fuel as well nonetheless. As long as you dont understand that, Ill keep on replying as well.

That is why I keep replying, until you get that.

I get how my reply holds the misinterpretation possibility. I get how nitpick can sound like im arguing with you now(although ironically, i meant use that for the purpose of not making it an argument and just some side trivia)

But you still dont admit that your "example" can be misinterpret as much as mine can ambiguously, and what you should write is "various goddesses are said to be bunrei" when referencing that or "stheno and the other goddess are said to be wakemitama", which annoys me
and
you still make a point that the whole thing is my fault even when you play a part that escalates the whole deal from your​ misinterpretation. AND you had to specifically said its all on me, which i really dont appreciate, like you made yourself to be on the high horse, intentionally or not.

I will keep on replying, until you get and admit that.

[Lily Emilio]

And the moment that you kept on replying back even if I already explained that was not my intention, you play a part at escalating the whole deal. Doesnt matter if Im the starter, pal, youre the fuel as well nonetheless. As long as you dont understand that, Ill keep on replying as well.

No, you were the one who replied after my very first reply that it was an example. Had you said "oh ok" then nothing will escalate.

But you still dont admit that your "example" can be misinterpret as much as mine can ambiguously

Nope. That's just you. Because you view that as me describing the scene at first until you realized it's an example.

you still make a point that the whole thing is my fault even when you play a part that escalates the whole deal from your​ misinterpretation

I did not misinterpret the fact that you tried to nitpick me. I only got the wrong impression that you are acting almighty.

I will keep on replying, until you get and admit that.

I won't, because I never did that.

[Nobody]

At this point just take it to PMs.

Good lord.

[castor212]

No, you were the one who replied after my very first reply that it was an example. Had you said "oh ok" then nothing will escalate.

Nope. That's just you. Because you view that as me describing the scene at first until you realized it's an example.

I did not misinterpret the fact that you tried to nitpick me. I only got the wrong impression that you are acting almighty.

I won't, because I never did that.

I said the equivalent of that already in my reply, which you dont seem to register and then kept on replyong relentlessly.
But I wont just said "oh ok" and leave it at that because fact is, your example is written in a way that can be misleading to other, which i then tries to point out, regarless of it being example or not, which you dont seem to get by replying endlessly.

Doesnt change the fact that it can be taken misleadingly.

And that misinterpretation of yours is the one that escalates this. Not mine.

Then i guss we're doing this dance forever, because you did do that.