It should be changed to "Knight of On Her" because Lancelot is more famous for stealing wives then for beating people with a stick.
The way I see it, the NP isn't about stealing things. The name is A Knight Does Not Die Empty Handed, the NP is about fighting to the last even in dire circumstances and not letting go of your knight values in the face of adversity, which ties well with his legend, his regrets, and the anecdote that actually gave birth to the NP (which isn't about stealing). It's specially poignant because his Berserker self is abandoning those values because of his regret, but both of his NPs represent knighthood anyway, it's a way to show that these things are integral to who he is no matter what.
We only see it as stealing things because he fought against Mr. NPs-are-arrows.
Of course that's all my own interpretation, but I just don't see the "stealing" thing being reinforced in any part of his concept except for Owner, which is probably a pun with Honor anyway so it works out.
Btw I'm not trying to argue that Knight of Honor is correct, it isn't, just saying this because it kinda bothers me to see the NP regarded as just stealing things since I think Berserker Lancelot is more thematically consistent than that.
Last edited by pinetree; December 6th, 2018 at 05:10 PM. Reason: Ate a word, oops
Personally I prefer the idea of A Knight Does Not Die Empty Handed signifying that you keep fighting with whatever you can get your hands on, whether its a twig, a street pole or another hero's NP
- - - Updated - - -
but really it doesnt matter whether you use Honor or Owner since everyone gets what you mean from context
Sorry, I talked about FGO mats only because it was an example. However, I thought that it was only a pun between Honor and Owner, too. And it is also true that everyone can interpret what they want, be it of honor or ownership, but I agree with pinetree for his interpretation.
Five years since Zero was published and we're still arguing over Owner / Honor. God, we suck
If True Ether is mana from the age of gods, and the reverse side of the world is where stuff from the AoG went to, then the reverse side's atmosphere should have True Ether in it right?
Originally Posted by FSF 5, Chapter 14: Gold and Lions I
Though abandoned, forgotten, and scorned as out-of-date dolls, they continue to carry out their mission, unchanged from the time they were designed.
Machines do not lose their worth when a newer model appears.
Their worth (life) ends when humans can no longer bear that purity.
Wait, Aniplex used the wikia?
Aniplex uses Reddit and here through Arashi.
"Only in my company, will you not be a monster"
anywhere than here
Originally Posted by FSF 5, Chapter 14: Gold and Lions I
Though abandoned, forgotten, and scorned as out-of-date dolls, they continue to carry out their mission, unchanged from the time they were designed.
Machines do not lose their worth when a newer model appears.
Their worth (life) ends when humans can no longer bear that purity.
Last edited by You; December 6th, 2018 at 05:59 PM.
Originally Posted by FSF 5, Chapter 14: Gold and Lions I
Though abandoned, forgotten, and scorned as out-of-date dolls, they continue to carry out their mission, unchanged from the time they were designed.
Machines do not lose their worth when a newer model appears.
Their worth (life) ends when humans can no longer bear that purity.
It's not that surprising. Say you're translating something TM for Aniplex. But you're not a fan, so you don't know the terminology. You do a quick google search, one of the first results will be the wiki and with it the translation you're looking for. It's not something exclusive to TM, I'm sure many franchises do the same thing.
For example, apparently that is how Toole's name was officially declared, well, Toole. It was a mistranslation that the wiki used, and then in the dub of Apocrypha they used that same name, probably because they grabbed it off the wiki.
Originally Posted by FSF 5, Chapter 14: Gold and Lions I
Though abandoned, forgotten, and scorned as out-of-date dolls, they continue to carry out their mission, unchanged from the time they were designed.
Machines do not lose their worth when a newer model appears.
Their worth (life) ends when humans can no longer bear that purity.
I actually think Toole sounds better so