Heracles is the son of a spaceship that can turn humanoid. It makes more sense for Berser-car to be his default state and the form we always see to be his transformation.
Heracles is the son of a spaceship that can turn humanoid. It makes more sense for Berser-car to be his default state and the form we always see to be his transformation.
More the son of a spaceship’s ghost turned into a SMT demon when you think about it.
But no, Bersercar is still a gag. Even Lu Bu who is quite more robotic as a character and presentation would still be a gag if he turned into a car.
or maybe they just need to unlock nen?
While she's waiting for her ride in Yuga Kshetra.
Then why do his normal Projections last for so long? Wouldn't they just fade quickly like Rin said?
Rin clearly says another magus wouldn't be able to do what he does (hinting at something else influencing it), and Shirou has UBW. Becoming proficient with it later doesn't mean he couldn't have been using it before earlier, since we know his knowledge is already flawed/incomplete from the beginning.Originally Posted by Fate route Day 12 Scene 7 said:
- - - Updated - - -
Nvm, Heaven's Feel says this:
Guess it's UBW all the way down.Originally Posted by Heaven's Feel - Day 12 - 09 said:
And a auper duper fishing rod per HA. But it's Projection, not UBW.
- - - Updated - - -
The Tamamo we know is something like a terminal for Amaterasu's full power, the more tails she gets the stronger the connection becomes until they become one and the same.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
If earlier material is contradicted by the later, surely it's reasonable to rather believe the latter?
Didnt Clocktower 2015 give explicit instructions on what to do when the lore from one book contradicts another?
I tend to go by the opposite logic actually. Earlier material is more relevant since it's when the work was actually written and representative of the author's thoughts/mindset at the time of writing. Whereas later details (especially if they're from spinoffs or side-materials) can be just retcons or the author changing his mind/forgetting what he originally wrote.
For instance in JoJo's Bizarre Adventure part 4 it's explicitly stated that Rohan can't use Heaven's Door to view or rewrite his own memories, whereas in the spinoff Rohan At The Louvre (set earlier in his life) he does just that. Given the former context is where the character and his powers were originally conceptualized, I'm inclined to say (for the purpose of versus battles and the like, at least when it's not specified which "version" is being used) that's the "truest" representation of what he can do and the latter is more like a side-story that might not fit perfectly into canon.
Of course it can be more complicated since lore and ability details can even develop over the course of a single narrative (Araki is also guilty of this), but in general I'd say it depends on how prominent the early material is compared to the later. Chronology isn't the only relevant consideration.
Last edited by RoydGolden; June 18th, 2021 at 02:10 PM.
No actually, Louvre is set seven years after the events of DiU. Therefore it is possible to argue that since the Stand has a Development Potential of "A" that he could have achieved the power to control his own body in that time-span.
A better example for your point using Louvre would be that Rohan has Heaven's Door at all when he was seventeen despite the fact that he claims in DiU that it awakened when he was shot with the Stand Arrow just before the events of DiU when he was twenty.
Last edited by Skull; June 18th, 2021 at 02:19 PM.
"Here's a bangin lil' tune about takin' on The Man!"
(Check out my Super Special Awesome Servant Compendium here)
You're actually right there, thanks. I got confused since I read Louvre a while back but just remembered that it was set when Rohan was 17, forgetting how that particular scene took place afterwards in the present. I believe my general point still holds but that was a poor example.
I personally always go with later material taking precedence because what the author thought at the time of writing doesn't necessarily account for how they might view it differently in the future in light of other things they have written or said or developed.
We know that Seimei's historically recorded death was in 1005 and that TM Seimei was still alive in the early 1100s (Tamamo's death).
The Heian Singularity is set in 1008 and when Fujimaru mentions that Seimei was supposed to have died 3 years before, Kintoki has absolutely no idea where that idea came from.
So Seimerlin theory lives on I guess. Hope we get to see him at least one day.