I'm still salty for TM making Rama way weaker than Karna/Arjuna but hey, I guess it's the fame boost
I'm still salty for TM making Rama way weaker than Karna/Arjuna but hey, I guess it's the fame boost
Rama suffered from it because he's not in his prime form. Against godarjuna who is a fusion divinity of the Hindu pantheon, all avatars of individual Hindu gods are equally meaningless. He did his best using Vishnu's divinity to control the curse. Saber Rama is Rama who is still young and inexperienced, so wait for Archer Rama.
Prime Rama is stronger than Arjuna and Karna combined.
almost every India myth heroes are wanked so hard from the lore and Rama is on the top.
Yes, he wanted Ash as one of his generals.
Rama is pretty strong, decent stats and skills, can multiclass as Saber/Archer/Lancer due to a combination of his skill and Indian GoB style NP. Just that he doesn't really get much focus on that part. If you're asking about actual myth stuff then yeah, he's pretty strong there as well.
Interesting! I thought Brahma was supposed to be above all other deities, though - basically omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Or is that too Western a view of him?
I'm surprised it's a view at all considering Brahma is for all purposes the wishing well in most stories for the villains to get boons with certain caveats that X can defeat them. And other gods generally get the whole "will destroy the universe" shtick that puts them higher up in the hierarchy that varies from myth to myth.
It's Vishnu being the boss here as he is considered to be similar to Brahman (not to be confused with the god Brahma) in Vishnu branch of Hinduism. Due to obtaining Vishnu's power from absorbing his friend Krishna, Arjuna was able to fuse with most other Hindu gods and gain their Authorities. This is a speculation by Pepe.
Wait, hold on - Brahma and Brahman are different beings?
Wow, this is confusing.
shit BL says
Once and always and nevermore.
I find the varying branches interesting
Like the one sect that puts ganesha above every other diety for example (i mean he is flat out one of the most worshipped of all the hindu gods...)
At least on the surface, it doesn't seem so confusing: Brahma is the concrete being, the creator deity who is part of a trinity with Shiva and Vishnu; Brahman is the abstract concept which represents transcedence, eternity and so on. My earlier confusion is because the texts I had read presented Brahma and Brahman as if they were one and the same thing, placing Brahma above other gods as a sort of "overdeity" comparable to the Abrahamic God.