Originally Posted by
I Can't Believe It's Not A NoblePhantasm
Well, since we've transitioned into Saber VS Berserker since I was gone, might as well bring this up. Not only does both shirou's believe it's possible for Saber to beat Berserker, but Nasu clearly intended for that as an option. The only question is who's more likely to win. From fate/side material 2: Takeuchi: On paper, I imagine there are many servants who can't even touch Berserker under normal circumstances. Nasu: It does take an Ex rank Noble Phantasm or the A rank Saber to defeat Berserker in a square fight. He is quite literally a killer of mediocre heroes. Tekeuchi: Yeah, you'd have to be a top-class hero to stand toe-to-toe with Berserker. So, Saber being able to beat Herc directly is not in question. It's cannon. Now, this statement might indicate that Artoria's Excalibur might be 1 life short of killing Herc, and the rest is a direct CQB fight, or if there's evidence elsewhere that she can one-shot him (assuming the distinction of A-rank Saber as opposed to Ex-rank NP was intended to mean this), then this is another example of Excalibur having Ex-rank attack potency despite its rank. This is, of course, if the several comparisons between it and Ea weren't enough. Also, Caliburn < Gram < Excalibur. Bringing up the FGO statements does not change this. In fact, what was specifically mentioned is a usage of Caliburn that causes it to self-destruct. I don't believe there was anything in FSN that indicated that Artoria actually broke it. Even then, on the same scale /=/ it's a peer. It could be a fancy way of saying it's an anti-fortress NP.