Hey uh Quibi, do you need original resolution version of the assembled "mini" images?
I ask because, due to the transparency and stuff, I actually was instead using the existing mini images as the source and just overlaying the higher-quality OP thumbnails on top of it for the updated SD images. Then for the HD images I would upscale via nearest neighbor (to retain pixel clarity), make some manual adjustments to the resulting pixel alignments so that the pixel sizes and ratios are consistent between the SD and HD version, and then once again overlay the higher-quality OP thumbnails to get a resulting HD "mini" image.
So if I were to provide an original resolution of the complete assembled "mini" image, then it wouldn't actually be the source for said assembled HD "mini" image because it was effectively created and assembled directly at its needed resolution rather than downscaled from a larger original resolution like the "title" images are.
One thing I can at least do is include the thumbnails by themselves in their original resolution with the according contrast & saturation adjustments (especially since that needs to be done before adding the border gradient), and I can include the according versions with border gradient as well (which is twice as think on the "mini" images).
(also you're not allowed to complain if you don't like that my higher-quality classic_op_ubw_mini doesn't look as saturated as the existing image because I wanted to use the same settings for both that image and classic_op_fate_mini and the 2nd and 3rd thumbnails on my classic_op_fat_mini already looks more saturated than the existing classic_op_fate_mini.png/webp image so any more saturation will make Saber will look flat-out sun-burnt)
----------------------------------------------------------------
It was actually the not-so tech savvy types I was concerned about since I imagine a more tech savvy person is more likely to manually check for updated software.
Also this "ultimate edition" is much easier to get up and running with all the extras and stuff than it is to get the non-ultimate edition RN PC version up and running with comparable extras.
As someone that's totally not a software and coding guy, I like that this site hasn't hoped on any mobile-focused web development bandwagons that I never really liked aesthetically. Perhaps the backend of the forum is trash, but the frontend is still the sort of thing I prefer and in general I still really like how the web looked before mobile-focused stuff came into play (the most obvious other example would be vndb.org, though linuxmint.com is also a good example of a pre-mobile site design that isn't using a dark color scheme).
I mean, you can even use this forum and post without issue even with javascript disabled (if you know a bit of html that is, e.g. you need to use "<p>" or the like if you want a line-break); even when having javascript enabled it doesn't cause underclocked 800MHz CPUs to sit fully-pegged for a full minute, so overclocked to 4.5GHz results in this site flying.