Honestly one issue is stuff thats in ambigious territory tbh
Like stuff that occurs but we arent told why or how
Honestly the perfect wiki for me is something like 1d4chan
Just don't include stuff that's drawing conclusions or inference or anything. People can make their own interpretations elsewhere but just because something is ambiguous doesn't mean it can't be no a wiki, you just put all the ambiguous parts on the page and whoever's reading can piece it together themselves.
This sounds incredibly interesting. I think I'm gonna be following this to see where it goes.
The joys of being a Mommy
Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Complete.
Servant Database (v2.0)
CHALDEA SECURITY ORGANIZATION: AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY
Singularity / Lostbelt Database
For those of you who'd like to see how far I'm getting on constructing new Servant sheets
Upcoming Servant Sheets
tbh I would be happy if we just worked on a new updated Seikadoc.
The fuck's that
And if it's what I think it is, is there a link somewhere?
Call me 想φαγω.
Spoiler:
Is this some high level joke I can't understand?
Call me 想φαγω.
Spoiler:
Oh, that's Seikadoc? I didn't remember it having any references to that when I read it.
Call me 想φαγω.
Spoiler:
I'd say it has its advantages over a wiki in terms of weaving in the discussion and conclusion and understandings.
....what?
Having a document that not only has the actual source but then also references posts that elaborate on the information in that source further so that MORE people can understand is surely the OPPOSITE of gatekeeping, wouldn't you agree?