Is it?. I still remember when I said I like SAO and don't see the problems others see and 2 people acted like I wrote hate speech and said the most horrid and wrong thing ever. Like I was some kind of flat earther for saying "SAO good".One of them trying to act like a certain youtuber is the wisest and most correct person ever. So, clearly going against the anime critics and failing to see things like they do is some kind of problem in my part. Extreme enough that I should be considered subhuman for it. I clearly was treated as "subhuman in need of enlightement to become human" when I said "SAO good" that one time.
Also, the time I said Fire Force is good and that one anti-censorship rant manga page isn't as bad as people claim. That opinion also got one of the dudes heated and acting like I was a criminal because I didn't see the "takes" he sees. And he's correct and I'm subhuman and wrong
Maybe anime critics should learn to control themselves and their "this is why this show is objective shit and if you like it, you're wrong and should feel bad" rants. I do have my thoughts on the whole "you can like things and criticise them" mindset, but it's best I don't write them
Also, anime critics can write whatever rants they want and imply a lot of shit about those who dfsagree and nobody will say anything, but the moment anyone jumps in defense of a critcised show and says the smallest thing against the critics, the defender is wrong and a shit person. Anime critics are way too defended and protected