Originally Posted by
Random
I question the efficacy of using the Library of Babel as a basis for Magecraft.
It contains all possible descriptions, right? Even if you had a description of a viable spell, you'd still need to deduce its mechanics and interpret it in a non-linguistic way.
And likewise, it also contains an innumerable amount of examples that look like valid spells but aren't, and would fail to cast at all, and the only way to tell would be to try and fail. On top of that, it would also list a near-infinite amount of things that are straight-up impossible or just plain gibberish.
The Library of Babel contains a book that will tell you who was in Paris, but it will also contain a book that tells you literally everyone who wasn't in Paris and claim that they were.
In other words, you'd literally have more luck with random trial and error. At least attempting every single possible thing in no particular order in real life while completely ignoring the library would naturally rule out all of the gibberish and things that could not actually be done.
Essentially, the concept is useless. In the Library of Babel, the only reliable way to find a book worth reading is to write it yourself. Believe me, I've used it.